Yes you read that title correctly – subjects apparently gained an average of 3.3lbs of muscle in 6 days. And I’ll show you what they did.
It became known as “The Nautilus North Study”.
Published in the November 2005 issue of Ironman magazine, the results from 11 subjects were as follows:
Subject |
Change in Lean Tissue |
Number of Days it Took To Produce Peak Gain after Workout |
1 |
3.9 lb |
10 days |
2 |
2.1 lb |
5 days |
3 |
4.9 lb |
1 days |
4 |
2.4 lb |
6 days |
5 |
1.9 lb |
1 days |
6 |
2.1 lb |
7 days |
7 |
1.5 lb |
10 days |
8 |
2.2 lb |
11 days |
9 |
1.7 lb |
5 days |
10 |
9.3 lb |
6 days |
11 |
3.3 lb |
9 days |
Average |
3.2 lb |
6.5 days |
Range |
1.5 – 9.3 lbs |
1 – 11 days |
NOTE: It was only a single workout. Subjects were then placed in a Bodpod every day afterwards to see what happened to their lean mass weight. You will note that it took an average of 6.5 days for peak gains to be produced after the workout.
Why?
Building muscle is BI-PHASIC i.e. it occurs in 2 phases. The workout only STIMULATES the recovery and growth process to begin, it does not PRODUCE growth.
Growth is produced in the rest period between workouts. And the muscle must be left undisturbed in order to let the growth process fully complete.
That’s what the guys in this subject did. 1 workout, then rest. Followed by daily Bodpod readings to see what was happening inside the body.
Remember that if you work a muscle again before this recovery and growth process has finished, you’ll get nowhere. You accomplish nothing and make no gains. This is the definition of overtraining – doing too much work too soon. For more, see my article, ‘Yes CT Fletcher, You Can Overtrain‘.
SO HOW DID THEY TRAIN?
They used a lifting technique called Max Contraction. You can get the book on Max Contraction and this study here.
Actually, it’s not really a “lifting” technique at all, since there is no lifting involved.
The idea is to select an exercise for each body part and bring the weight into the position of maximum contraction. Then you merely statically contract against it. No lifting. No lowering.
The weight for each exercise in this study was so heavy that the subjects could only statically contract against the load for 1-6 seconds.
As an example. Take a Cable Preacher Curl for the biceps. You might use 100lbs for 10 reps to failure normally.
If you did not do the lifting and lowering portion on the rep, you could use a much heavier weight to statically contract against. Now imagine taking it a step further and finding a weight that you could only statically contract against for a maximum of 6 seconds.
You’d have to get a training partner to help you get the weight into position (the top of the rep). But once it’s there, it’s all you. And the muscle fibers of your biceps are contracting against a load they have NEVER before experienced.
A set of 8-12 reps to failure is around 60-85% of your 1 rep max. But here, we aren’t even using your 1 rep max (100%). Since it’s not a lift, but a static contraction, you could be using 150%, if not more, of your 1 rep max!
The intensity of this muscular contraction is simply beyond anything you have ever been exposed to before.
WHY IS IT EFFECTIVE?
Firstly, am I skeptical about these gains? Very. The Bodpod can show increased water weight as lean gains. Not to mention I don’t believe this study was actually published in any journal.
However, advanced techniques can ignite new gains, of that there is no doubt.
The fact is…when you create a MASSIVE jump in intensity levels – beyond what you’ve ever experienced – you will stimulate new gains.
And I mean intensity levels well above 100% – I call it “hyperintensity”.
Here’s what I mean…
Before you ever started training, what sort of intensity of effort was your body exposed to? Well your daily activities probably never caused you to work any muscle beyond 20% – 30% intensity of effort. And of course, since there was no reason for your body to change, your muscle mass levels remained the same (or even atrophied).
So you start training, and let’s assume you used a science-based routine like THT. Going to failure each set in a the 8-12 rep range is training at up to 85% of your one rep max. That’s 85% as a percentage of 1 rep max and taking every set to 100% (failure), which has been shown in study after study to be optimal for size gains.
So what happens when you go from 30% to 85% – BANG! – The “Newbie Gains” phenomenon. The drastic change in intensity that your muscles are exposed to forces your body to adapt! How? More muscle mass.
But what if you could create a workout that actually caused you to work above 100%? I’m talking levels of ~150% of your 1 rep max?
Well again…your body will be forced to adapt to this massive change in intensity. How? More muscle mass.
Training above 100% is what I am calling “HYPERINTENSE” training.
HOW TO TRY IT
First, I must say that it is advanced techniques like this that form the basis of my experimental protocols – The Chest Blast, Arms Blast and Leg Blast workouts They are designed to take you far beyond normal training and normal results – you’ll LOVE these programs. They contain strategies like the above (and more you’ve never heard of). In fact, many trainees report to me, “I’ve never trained like this before!”.
If you want to try some max contractions, you’ll need to do them at the start of your workout (after warming up).
Only at the start will you have 100% of your strength and be able to train above 100% of your 1 rep max.
For this to work, the intended muscle needs to be brought into a position of maximum contraction. This means using isolation exercises, and only a few are suitable.
For example, the position of max contraction for the quads is full extension at the leg extension machine. For the biceps, it’s the top of the rep of a cable preacher curl or machine curl.
Here are examples of the best exercises for max contraction:
Quadriceps: Leg Extensions
Hamstrings: Leg Curls
Biceps: Cable Preacher Curls
Triceps: Cable Kickback (almost fully extended position)
Chest: Pec Deck
Lats: Pullover Machine
Calves: Standing Calf Raises
Additionally, if you love advanced techniques, make sure you don’t miss my recent article, ‘6 Advanced Techniques To Build Muscle That You’ve Never Head Of‘.
Now, if you aren’t training correctly, you just need to start growing – today! Download free, science-based THT training. You can always throw in the heavy artillery later if you want.
See the results other guys have achieved here. NOTE: You don’t have to go to your email to confirm anything. Once you click the button, you’ll be taken straight to the download page 😀 I operate a ‘Strictly Zero Spam‘ policy.
If you have any questions or comments, just talk to me below. I’m always happy to help.
I’M SOCIAL – ADD ME & LET ME HELP YOU…
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Google+
Train With Intensity!
Mark
Love new stuff! I’ll try this before my next biceps day. We do have the preacher machine in my gym 😀
I did hear about this before but never looked into applying it. Seems very interesting. Hard to imagine what 150% will feel like!!
Mark.. im going to add this to my 3 day full body THT routine, On the 2nd set only and add negatives and static holds to ignite new growth, my question is…how many workouts do i do this for, and when i go back into the usual progressive THT will i still gain after doing a super intense workout using the negatives and static holds? Hope that makes sense.
Pete Sisco has been writing about this for years. I’ve read his stuff but never tried. He writes convincingly and seems to have science behind him but I don’t know…in his system you can get to the point where you’re only training each muscle like every 2 weeks or something crazy. He (not coincidentally I’m sure) even sells special equipment to work with this kind of system. It’s interesting stuff, I’d like for someone like Mark to really do it and report on the results.
Great stuff. Gonna do it. One thing though. If I’m supposed to do it at the beginning of the workout, should that be all the work the muscle gets? Like if I did the pec deck for chest like this, should I stop hitting the chest afterwards or can I then do my normal lifts?
Seems the Bullworker may well be the best for this type of static contractions.
https://www.google.co.in/webhp?tab=nw&ei=UcIwVbXDCMLi8AXVkoGoDA&ved=0CAQQqS4oAQ#q=bullworker+exercise
Mark, request your views on this.
@JaSoN. Well that hasn’t been studied so you’ll just have to test it out, bud. Try it over 1 week and see what happens the following week.
@BP. I think Sisco promotes static contraction, not maximal contractions. So he has people using insane weight in an almost extended position on say a leg press. Problem is, the weight is simply ‘resting’ there on the bones. There isn’t much actual muscular contraction going on. So his system sucks in my honest opinion.
@Tommy. I would recommend you do 2 or 3 sets (1-6 seconds) followed up by your normal sets.
@Aanand. No, the bullworker simply cannot put enough tension on the muscle. It’s too easy. The idea is to use a weight that you cannot contract against for more than 6 seconds max. The bullworker cannot provide this high level of resistance. It’s just too easy.
OK. Got it. Thanks Mark.
This sounds like a variation of isometric exercises which have been around for centuries. Isometrics can produce impressive increases in strength but I did not expect such a significant increase in muscle size.
Mark , do you think its smart to do them at the start of every workout or just once in a while?
How about shoulders, Mark? What exercise can you do heavily loaded static hold for shoulders? I find that when doing db front and lateral raises even lowering the weight slowly and under full muscle control is very difficult at 8-12 rep weight range. When using conservative “optimized form” I can lift a lot more than I can hold at max contraction. What are your thoughts? Thanks.