<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: STUDY FINDS HOW TO DOUBLE YOUR ARM GAINS	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/</link>
	<description>free workouts to build muscle &#38; lose fat fast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:37:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21242#comment-107129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107124&quot;&gt;Glenn&lt;/a&gt;.

@Glenn. The variety factor could be playing a role.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107124">Glenn</a>.</p>
<p>@Glenn. The variety factor could be playing a role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21242#comment-107128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107125&quot;&gt;JaSoN&lt;/a&gt;.

@Jason. 90 would be about mid rage - 90 degree bend in the arms. I think you are thinking about the lock out position at the top - fully extended.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107125">JaSoN</a>.</p>
<p>@Jason. 90 would be about mid rage &#8211; 90 degree bend in the arms. I think you are thinking about the lock out position at the top &#8211; fully extended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve McGrath		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McGrath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21242#comment-107127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, they were only moving through a 45 degree arc from towards the floor to parallel to the floor?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, they were only moving through a 45 degree arc from towards the floor to parallel to the floor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian R		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21242#comment-107126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does the group doing partials use a higher weight (as I assume would be required to reach failure with a partial rep)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the group doing partials use a higher weight (as I assume would be required to reach failure with a partial rep)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JaSoN		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JaSoN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21242#comment-107125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark.. I thought stopping just before 90 degrees was a must as the tension on the triceps falls off at the top or were these guys on a decline bench?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark.. I thought stopping just before 90 degrees was a must as the tension on the triceps falls off at the top or were these guys on a decline bench?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenn		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/study-finds-how-to-double-your-arm-gains/#comment-107124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21242#comment-107124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think this primarily works because most subjects probably have been doing a full range of motion their entire life.  Instituting this partial range is probably their muscles responding to a new stimulus, not necessarily that partial range works better.  It is a good idea to change it up, but I think you&#039;d see similar gains if you had always done partial range of motion and started doing full range.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this primarily works because most subjects probably have been doing a full range of motion their entire life.  Instituting this partial range is probably their muscles responding to a new stimulus, not necessarily that partial range works better.  It is a good idea to change it up, but I think you&#8217;d see similar gains if you had always done partial range of motion and started doing full range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
