<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Should You Train To Failure In Every Set?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/</link>
	<description>free workouts to build muscle &#38; lose fat fast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Duncan M		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-42266</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-42266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark, gotta say I love THT and which ever program I now use, I go to failure on every set. Going to failure is the only way I feel satisfied, giving 100% every set, and I still progressively overload by squeezing out one more rep or upping the weight next workout. 
However, I&#039;ve read that always going to failure can damage your CNS, and studies have shown better strength gains without going to failure. This is a problem because I would like to accelerate strength gains more while preserving the CNS, but I still like to train to failure; it would be hard to switch back to set number of reps per set. I don&#039;t find it intense enough.
Any comments? 
Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, gotta say I love THT and which ever program I now use, I go to failure on every set. Going to failure is the only way I feel satisfied, giving 100% every set, and I still progressively overload by squeezing out one more rep or upping the weight next workout.<br />
However, I&#8217;ve read that always going to failure can damage your CNS, and studies have shown better strength gains without going to failure. This is a problem because I would like to accelerate strength gains more while preserving the CNS, but I still like to train to failure; it would be hard to switch back to set number of reps per set. I don&#8217;t find it intense enough.<br />
Any comments?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13985</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13985</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just recommend a whey isolate, micronized creatine and some glutamine. I hope they&#039;re available to you.
Mark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recommend a whey isolate, micronized creatine and some glutamine. I hope they&#8217;re available to you.<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: howitz		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Mark , the book is great , i am allready sticking to it , but i have some questions , here we don&#039;t have that much supplements , what do you think about Muscle Tech ? Cell-Tech and Nitro-Tech ?

Thanks forwards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mark , the book is great , i am allready sticking to it , but i have some questions , here we don&#8217;t have that much supplements , what do you think about Muscle Tech ? Cell-Tech and Nitro-Tech ?</p>
<p>Thanks forwards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sam.d		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sam.d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thanks mark   
i tried this about a week back i was doing push ups with 20kg plate on my back and had done 9 reps
then the next training session i was aiming for 10 reps(1 more rep) i done 10 reps and tried bust out another 2 reps extra it was so hard and i was bearly moving but managed to do it(the last rep took 10 seconds trying to push up)
and today it felt like nothing and got to 20 reps  
progress man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks mark<br />
i tried this about a week back i was doing push ups with 20kg plate on my back and had done 9 reps<br />
then the next training session i was aiming for 10 reps(1 more rep) i done 10 reps and tried bust out another 2 reps extra it was so hard and i was bearly moving but managed to do it(the last rep took 10 seconds trying to push up)<br />
and today it felt like nothing and got to 20 reps<br />
progress man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew Mast		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Mast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[David B above poses a good question which I think does redefine &quot;failure&quot; I believe that there is a difference between training to failure and training to failure while maintaining good form.  I train to failure (WITH GOOD FORM) on every exercise (including squats) and haven&#039;t seen injury.  I think the GOOD FORM part is a critical &quot;adjective&quot; and it may clarify in the THT book to merely at &quot;GOOD FORM&quot; if that&#039;s the intention.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David B above poses a good question which I think does redefine &#8220;failure&#8221; I believe that there is a difference between training to failure and training to failure while maintaining good form.  I train to failure (WITH GOOD FORM) on every exercise (including squats) and haven&#8217;t seen injury.  I think the GOOD FORM part is a critical &#8220;adjective&#8221; and it may clarify in the THT book to merely at &#8220;GOOD FORM&#8221; if that&#8217;s the intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew Mast		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13692</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Mast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve already been applying this THT positive failure for two weeks and I&#039;m still getting progressive rep or weight increases, so I&#039;m on board and it&#039;s a great feeling to push that last rep to failure with all the energy I have.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already been applying this THT positive failure for two weeks and I&#8217;m still getting progressive rep or weight increases, so I&#8217;m on board and it&#8217;s a great feeling to push that last rep to failure with all the energy I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi David,
This applies to all lifts in THT training. Going to failure does not increase risk of injury, poor form or heavy weights you aren&#039;t ready for will however.
A lot of people&#039;s definition of compound and isolation is way off. Using biomechanically optimized form, almost all exercises in THT are compound lifts. 6-9 sets to failure will certainly not constitute overtraining.
Mark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,<br />
This applies to all lifts in THT training. Going to failure does not increase risk of injury, poor form or heavy weights you aren&#8217;t ready for will however.<br />
A lot of people&#8217;s definition of compound and isolation is way off. Using biomechanically optimized form, almost all exercises in THT are compound lifts. 6-9 sets to failure will certainly not constitute overtraining.<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David B.		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/should-you-train-to-failure-in-every-set/#comment-13650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=610#comment-13650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark,

I think you should clearly outline which lifts, if not all, you believe this principle to apply.  For those who train primarily with Olympic and compound lifts you&#039;re not only risking over training, but also injury prescribing a &quot;train to failure&quot; approach on every set.  Granted, I acknowledge your advice is in regards to THT; however, it would be greatly beneficial for clarification in not only the depth, but breadth of your advice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I think you should clearly outline which lifts, if not all, you believe this principle to apply.  For those who train primarily with Olympic and compound lifts you&#8217;re not only risking over training, but also injury prescribing a &#8220;train to failure&#8221; approach on every set.  Granted, I acknowledge your advice is in regards to THT; however, it would be greatly beneficial for clarification in not only the depth, but breadth of your advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
