<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Partial Chest Flys Are Better Than Full Range	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/</link>
	<description>free workouts to build muscle &#38; lose fat fast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 03:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Javier		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Javier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 03:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark,  I just started the THT 5 day program. I&#039;ve read that power cleans are good for explosiveness and since I play sports I was wondering where I could implement this in the program or do you not recommend it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,  I just started the THT 5 day program. I&#8217;ve read that power cleans are good for explosiveness and since I play sports I was wondering where I could implement this in the program or do you not recommend it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: krs		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94978</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[krs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mark I train alone at home and have difficulty in getting into decline position while holding heavy dumbbells any tips?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark I train alone at home and have difficulty in getting into decline position while holding heavy dumbbells any tips?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@KRS. Yes, it looks fine. Though do try Decline DUMBBELL Bench Presses as they have been shown to recruit more fibers. I&#039;m writing a post about it tomorrow, buddy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KRS. Yes, it looks fine. Though do try Decline DUMBBELL Bench Presses as they have been shown to recruit more fibers. I&#8217;m writing a post about it tomorrow, buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KRS		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KRS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Love the new vid Mark and fly style. Deep Dips play havoc with my shoulders so what if I done the following below adding the fly&#039;s at the end.
2x Decline Barbell Press
2x Incline Barbell Press
2x Flat Dumbbell Press
2x Dumbbell Partial Chest Fly&#039;s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the new vid Mark and fly style. Deep Dips play havoc with my shoulders so what if I done the following below adding the fly&#8217;s at the end.<br />
2x Decline Barbell Press<br />
2x Incline Barbell Press<br />
2x Flat Dumbbell Press<br />
2x Dumbbell Partial Chest Fly&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jared		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article. Chest flies are a difficult exercise for me. I find them awkward, so I&#039;m looking forward to trying this variation out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Chest flies are a difficult exercise for me. I find them awkward, so I&#8217;m looking forward to trying this variation out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Colby. Dips are best replaced with a decline bench press (same biomechanics) - either barbell or dumbbell. But this is a good 2nd choice substitute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Colby. Dips are best replaced with a decline bench press (same biomechanics) &#8211; either barbell or dumbbell. But this is a good 2nd choice substitute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@John. No, it doesn&#039;t strain the rotator cuff. Perhaps if someone had too wide an angle at the elbows it could cause damage. But like I say, just over 90degree bend places all the stress on the pecs themselves, there are no joint issues when performed like this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John. No, it doesn&#8217;t strain the rotator cuff. Perhaps if someone had too wide an angle at the elbows it could cause damage. But like I say, just over 90degree bend places all the stress on the pecs themselves, there are no joint issues when performed like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Colby Siebert		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colby Siebert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would this be a better exercise than &quot;weighted push-ups&quot; to replace chest dips?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this be a better exercise than &#8220;weighted push-ups&#8221; to replace chest dips?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t going deep put a lot of strain on your rotator cuff? My right one is kinda sensitive so I always try to not go past a 90 degree angle. 

Let me know your thoughts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t going deep put a lot of strain on your rotator cuff? My right one is kinda sensitive so I always try to not go past a 90 degree angle. </p>
<p>Let me know your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If available, I still think a pec deck machine is the the ultimate exercise of this type as you get full tension at the pcp. Partials a close second. Flat bench cables are also good, but I find standing cable flys uses too much delts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If available, I still think a pec deck machine is the the ultimate exercise of this type as you get full tension at the pcp. Partials a close second. Flat bench cables are also good, but I find standing cable flys uses too much delts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Chest Blaster and these are extremely effective as Mark says. Prepare for some soreness when you take these sets to failure!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Chest Blaster and these are extremely effective as Mark says. Prepare for some soreness when you take these sets to failure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/partial-chest-flys-are-better-than-full-range/#comment-94924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://musclehack.com/?p=11096#comment-94924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NOTED! Can&#039;t wait to try these! Thanks again Mark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTED! Can&#8217;t wait to try these! Thanks again Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
