<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Creatine Method Builds Twice The Muscle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/</link>
	<description>free workouts to build muscle &#38; lose fat fast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Random		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/#comment-107112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Random]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21034#comment-107112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey @Mark. That study uses Magnitude Based Inference for some analysis. Didn&#039;t know and went to research it. Turns out that comparison isn&#039;t reliable (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-shoddy-statistics-found-a-home-in-sports-research/) as generates some false positives. Doesn&#039;t invalidate the study&#039;s main conclusions (differences in fat-free mass and bench press max) but beware when seeing this kind of analysis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey @Mark. That study uses Magnitude Based Inference for some analysis. Didn&#8217;t know and went to research it. Turns out that comparison isn&#8217;t reliable (<a href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-shoddy-statistics-found-a-home-in-sports-research/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-shoddy-statistics-found-a-home-in-sports-research/</a>) as generates some false positives. Doesn&#8217;t invalidate the study&#8217;s main conclusions (differences in fat-free mass and bench press max) but beware when seeing this kind of analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/#comment-107111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21034#comment-107111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Awesome. Thanks. Been taking mine pre.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Thanks. Been taking mine pre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark McManus		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/#comment-107110</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark McManus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21034#comment-107110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/#comment-107109&quot;&gt;Jason Mazepa&lt;/a&gt;.

@Jason. Yes, do it buddy :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/#comment-107109">Jason Mazepa</a>.</p>
<p>@Jason. Yes, do it buddy 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Mazepa		</title>
		<link>https://musclehack.com/new-creatine-method-builds-twice-the-muscle/#comment-107109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Mazepa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.musclehack.com/?p=21034#comment-107109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting! I was always taking it mixed in with my Intra workout whey shake. But after seeing this study, I should leave it out and just take my creatine when I get back home after the work out. Pretty interesting and makes sense in the rebuild / recovery process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! I was always taking it mixed in with my Intra workout whey shake. But after seeing this study, I should leave it out and just take my creatine when I get back home after the work out. Pretty interesting and makes sense in the rebuild / recovery process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
