Comments on: Download Total Anabolism 3.1 FREE Now!

By: dan

dan — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 23:17:54 +0000

Sick Mark, thanks a ton.
One question, I’ve been doing rippetoes starting strength for the past 3 months and was wondering if the TA 3.1 workout is a good transition from strength training to hypertrophy specific training.
Thanks!

By: shawn

shawn — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:53:51 +0000

cant wait to try it

By: faris

faris — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:57:01 +0000

thanks Mark… i’ve been getting great results with T.A 2.0 and 3.0… i’m sure T.A 3.1 will be the best ever yet…

By: Mark McManus

Mark McManus — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:21:40 +0000

Yes. No-one got it.
I got questions every day (literally every day) saying, “I read the book but you never said how how often to do the workout). Quite frustrating.
Anyway, the studies on protein synthesis rates would indicate that the vast majority of people will be recovered 36-48hours later hence the new friendly approach.

By: Carl

Carl — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:31:06 +0000

Mark, thanks so much for the new book. I’ve been eagerly anticipating your new insights. I’m new to your site and was in the middle of a THT 3.0 program and am exctied to see the inclusion of the volume cycle in THT 3.1. I’ve already read the entire book and was just curious why you seem to have abandoned the idea of determining your own unique POP (which seemed very important in THT 3.0). You mentioned a technique in THT 3.0 to use to figure out if you were someone who only needed two days rest between workouts (physically gifted) or someone who needed three or more days rest (average person). THT 3.1 seems to suggest a more cookie cutter approach to rest periods (I’m referring to the HIT cycle) by recommending a more traditional Mon, Wed schedule. Have you found that this period works well for everyone or should the previous technique be used to determine optimal rest periods?